There is now considerable public discussion about the prospect of a large pumped storage scheme at Lake Onslow. It is possible to make an informed estimate as to how the scheme might be set up and consider various associated possibilities derived from it. Those interested can download a pdf file here, which covers a range of Onslow topics to varying degrees of detail. A useful overview of the geographical distribution of pumped storage schemes around the world can be found here.
For Onslow, unfortunately, misconceptions keep being repeated:
* It would create a net energy loss to the nation.
* Hydro spill will not be reduced.
* Onslow pumped storage can only be justified if hydro spill is reduced.
* Onslow pumped storage will deter investment in new renewables.
* A large lower reservoir will be needed.
* There will be significant loss of the pumped water through evaporation and leakage.
* The pumped storage scheme should be in the North Island.
* Onslow pumped storage will cause increased transmission loss.
* Onslow pumped storage will be detrimental to the power companies.
* If it was economic, it would have been built already by private enterprise.
* It’s too expensive.
* It will cause higher home electricity bills.
* There will be no local environmental gain to offset the Onslow wetland loss.
* Mudflats will be exposed at maximum Lake Onslow drawdown.
* Lake Onslow pumped storage is old technology and could become a white elephant.
* We should build more large hydro dams instead.
Responses to the above can be downloaded here.
The possibility of a pumped storage scheme at Lake Onslow in New Zealand’s South Island is presently under investigation by the NZ Battery group. If constructed, the scheme could enable significant reductions in national carbon dioxide emissions. This would be achieved by its elimination of extended periods of high electricity wholesale prices, including through dry years. The new price regime and power supply reliability would encourage transition from fossil fuels to electricity as the dominant energy source for transport and industrial heating. At the same time, the absence of high wholesale prices would make fossil fuel power generation uneconomic, leading to a situation of 100% renewable electricity generation. We cannot have emission reduction in energy without a solution to the dry year issue. Otherwise the new low-emission electrified economy (in transport, industrial heating, etc) will fail through lack of available power at the first dry year. Given an absence of coal-fired backup for dry years, Onslow would appear to be the best solution (but still to be confirmed by NZ Battery).
The scheme, if constructed, would define much of New Zealand’s green transition for many years to come. The situation as of July 2022 is that Onslow pumped storage has passed an initial evaluation, which will be followed by some level of decision in December.
The proposed configuration of the Onslow scheme should be made public in December.
If it proceeds, the Onslow pumped storage will be the largest hydro engineering project in New Zealand’s history, being equivalent to a combination of the Benmore Dam and the Manapouri Power Scheme. In addition, there are likely to be constructed environmental offsets of various types in the Otago region.
The scheme would also represent the greatest national impact ever achieved by a research concept originating from a New Zealand university. In this regard, I would like to acknowledge the work of my University of Waikato research students, Sarah Bear and Mohammed Majeed:
Sarah Bear (2005). Hydrological evaluation of pumped storage in the Onslow-Manorburn basin (MSc).
Mohammed Majeed (2019). Evaluating the potential for a multi-use seasonal pumped storage scheme in New Zealand’s South Island (PhD).
Onslow in the news
Selected items, both positive and negative, are listed below in time order. There is inevitably a degree of overlap. Some comments are added in places. Most news items date from the July 2020 election announcement of investigation of dry year alternatives, with emphasis on Lake Onslow pumped storage. There will be a further flurry of news items if the coming government announcements in December/January indicate that Onslow is selected as one of the dry year options of preference for detailed evaluation.
Govt eyes price of power as water spilt
ANU pumped hydro researchers take out Eureka Prize
This is not about Onslow but there are similarities in that Australian pumped storage sites were identified that would enable 100% renewable electricity there. In New Zealand, the University of Waikato has played a similar role to ANU, but with focus just on the Onslow scheme.
Storing energy for a transitioning grid
Govt looks to boost clean energy supply, commissions $30m investigation
Includes two 1News video clips about the New Zealand government July 2020 announcement of initiation of investigations into Lake Onslow pumped storage.
Lake Onslow hydro plan expensive and unnecessary
The Centre for Sustainability at the University of Otago advocates modification of electricity demand rather than increased storage capacity at Onslow. However, it isn’t clear that demand could be sufficiently reduced to take New Zealand through a dry year without significant economic impact.
A prudent approach to New Zealand’s renewable energy goals
Raises the possibility of a Taranaki gas alternative to Onslow.
$4 billion Lake Onslow pumped hydro scheme could ‘tip electricity market on head’
This is something of an over-reaction to the size of Onslow impacting the electricity market. Onslow is only “large” with respect to energy storage capacity. The generating capacity at Onslow will be about 1000 MW, which is just a little larger than the MW capacity of the Huntly power station. Nobody has suggested that Huntly is a huge energy gorilla with capability of tipping the electricity market on its head.
Ardern talks environment and economy on campaign trail in Taupō
Recognition of trade-offs between advantage and disadvantages of the Onslow scheme.
The Detail: Is renewable energy the best way for NZ tackle climate change?
The 100% renewable energy mentioned here is actually 100% renewable electricity.
Contact says Lake Onslow scheme would ‘paralyse’ investment in renewables
The potential ‘paralysis’ of renewable investment is often repeated. However, it is not clear why construction of what amounts to a large battery should deter new investment in renewable electricity in any way. Since November 2020 there have been many announcements of new solar, wind, and geothermal projects.
Pumped hydro to take a year longer
Lake Taupo possible ‘battery’ for power production
Energy storage possibilities in the Central North Island
Understanding Lake Onslow
Coal generation rises to highest share in 13 years
Energy Minister Megan Woods points out the potential value of Onslow pumped storage to offset coal use for power generation.
Critics warn Lake Onslow power scheme’s $4b price tag may balloon
Includes discussion of some engineering aspects.
Genesis imports US wood pellets to fuel Huntly renewable energy trial
Biofuel burning at Huntly is suggested as an Onslow alternative. However, that this would maintain high electricity prices into the future.
The giant puddle that could power NZ
A local view of the Onslow scheme and its environmental setting. Some great pics as well.
Farmers unhappy crucial land to be flooded under Government’s proposed Lake Onslow hydro storage scheme
Some less than optimal dealing with local farmers.
Geotech investigations to get underway for pumped hydro at Lake Onslow
Initiation of Onslow geotechnical investigations announced by Megan Woods.
So far, so good for multibillion-dollar Lake Onslow power scheme, Cabinet decides
Overview of the mid-year progress to date on dry year options.
Pumped hydro plan ticks boxes
Further comment on mid-year progress to date.
Lake Onslow climate conundrum
Concerns over environmental impact raised by Forest & Bird. A good summary on the ecological side. One correction is that the downstream Clutha River impact of Lake Onslow water will in fact be more positive than negative. This is because Onslow water will be released at times of low Clutha flow. The impact will be the other way around – didymo and other aquatic weeds will be introduced from the Clutha River into Lake Onslow and then to the Teviot River. If Onslow pumped storage goes ahead, it is important that constructed environmental offsets be considered as part of the scheme.
NZ Battery Project has air of déjà vu
This article was written just after the Onslow open day in Roxburgh on October 29. It was revealed for the first time that the underground power station could be 80 metres below the level of the Clutha River. This may be to enable the system to operate without having to construct an expensive new dam on the Clutha.
Lake Onslow not ideal for battery lake, cost ‘vastly understated’ – Contact Energy
This claim by Contact Energy is on the basis of a report by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG). The report was commissioned by Contact Energy, Genesis Energy, Mercury, and Meridian Energy. However, even in this context, the essential conclusion of the report concerning Onslow was not to have a conclusion:
The Government’s $80 million investigation into Lake Onslow will provide improved information on the project, including greater details on the cost, timeline to build, generation capacity, lake storage, how Lake Onslow will operate in the market, and other aspects like consenting. Until these details emerge it is too early to develop a strong view on its viability. (BCG p.12).
It is a pity that the gentailers did not take a similar view about Onslow and adopt a neutral stance until the Phase 1 reports come out from the NZ Battery investigation (due in December). With respect to Contact Energy, it would have been commercially helpful for them to advocate for Onslow construction, coupled with a tunnel link to Lake Roxburgh. Income from their Roxburgh power station would then be increased because at times of low electricity prices, some water from Lake Roxburgh would be diverted by pumping to Lake Onslow. Later, at times of high prices, the water would be returned back to lake Roxburgh to produce more income from power generated at the Roxburgh station.
What about North Island peaking ability?
If Onslow (or some other system) enables the aspirational goal of 100% renewable electricity, the North Island gas peaker stations would no longer be operative. Ability to bring in additional electricity quickly for a short time aids robustness of the grid, particularly in the case of a brief outage in south-north transfer. One approach is to have large batteries set up. However, batteries have a finite lifetime and are presently expensive – Contact Energy have recently cancelled their planned 100 MW battery because of rising material costs. Another approach is to construct some small pumped storage schemes in the North Island where the terrain allows. Such schemes are more expensive than batteries and will take time to construct. However, they have the advantage of being sustainable once operational.
An illustrative example is shown the figure below. The upper reservoir envisaged here is a 20-metre deep hole excavated at the 600 metre contour on a hill above Lake Whakamaru (lower reservoir) on the Waikato River. The new reservoir would require removal of about 0.8 square kilometres of pine plantation and a hill crest would need to be excavated away. Going from full to empty, the upper reservoir could provide 300 MW for two days, with some additional power coming from the nearby Whakamaru station. This represents more than the peaking capacity of the Tokaanu power station.
Hypothetical upper reservoir (blue) of a pumped storage scheme utilising Lake Whakamaru as the lower reservoir. The Whakamaru power station is on the left.
Earl Bardsley, University of Waikato, 2022